Сдам Сам

ПОЛЕЗНОЕ


КАТЕГОРИИ







Saving Lives, Recovering Bodies





That search and rescue dogs can achieve great things was also clear after the catastrophic earthquake in the Avellino region in southern Italy in November 1980, just as it was in Mexico City in September 1985, where more than 200 people were saved out of the rubble. Without our search and rescue dogs, only a few would have survived.

The same happened after the major earthquakes in Armenia (1988), Turkey (1992 and 1999), Japan (1995), Algeria (2003), Iran (2003), Haiti (2010), and, of course, in several smaller disasters where we and our colleagues saved many human lives. Our dogs also located the bodies of dead people, so that those could also be salvaged. Around the world, the opinion is now that careful training of search and rescue dogs is more necessary than ever. Events have proven that you can count on a search and rescue dog if the dog and its handler are trained with a useful method.

Figure 1.10 Around the world, careful training of search and rescue dogs is now considered more necessary than ever.

 

Training the Natural Way

 

After many years of training our dogs in the Schutzhund program, in the 1970s we decided to start training search and rescue dogs as well. Based on decades of study, we have, together with our Austrian colleagues, developed a new training method for search and rescue dogs, which, of course, can also be used for other dog-training purposes.

When we began our search and rescue training, we asked ourselves why so many handlers had problems with searching and tracking. We quickly realized the dogs didn’t enjoy our training model, and we found that it was because we didn’t take the dogs’ drives into account.

The Origins of Our Method

Let’s first have a look at how our new method developed. We have to go back to 1980 following the major earthquake disaster in southern Italy, when our search and rescue dogs located many dead bodies during their search for survivors. At the time we said to each other, “If we can come up with a way to teach dogs to differentiate live people from dead human bodies by special training, that would be the crown on our work with search and rescue dogs.” If a search and rescue dog could indicate the difference between dead and living victims beneath the debris, this would be of decisive importance for the salvage. Otherwise, while handlers can get an indication from their dogs of a human odor emanating from the rubble, they don’t know whether the human is still alive. When choosing where to dig first, handlers have to rely on luck to choose locations with live people.

New Insights

For many years dogs have been trained in several different ways for different tasks. Until recently, this training often lacked the support of any theoretical background. In the 1980s, we changed this for search and rescue dogs with the publication of our book The Search and Rescue Dog: Training and Mission. But time doesn’t stand still, and neither did our research into smell and search tactics. In our continuing studies during actual missions and training sessions, new insights were regularly gathered and, of course, used in training our search and rescue dogs.

At that time, we were already getting from our dogs a reliable indication of whether victims were dead or living. Our mission after the earthquake disaster of 1988 in Armenia provided convincing evidence of that. But our research continued and we sought to bring more precision and perfection to our training method.

Mechanical Training

Many handlers still train in a mechanical fashion. For example, when teaching the dog to sit, they lay their left hand on the rear of the dog and pull the dog up high with the leash while giving the command “Sit.” For that you don’t need any knowledge of dogs, you only have to listen to what the instructor is telling you.

Such training is also possible with search and rescue dogs, but this sort of mechanical approach leads to frustrations for the handler and dog. Mechanical training does not use the dog’s curiosity for search work. As soon as the dog has found the victim and doesn’t know what to do, we say: “Good boy. You have found him. Speak.” If the dog barks, it is praised. But for what? For barking, not for finding!

 

These types of exercises seem right from a human perspective. However, such training ignores important behavior patterns that the dog has inherited from its ancestors. Thus, when the dog is trained in a mechanical way, which provides only intermittent moments of searching, one might possibly get a dog that can search and track. But such a dog does not feel happy and will quit working quickly during a real search. Instead of purposefully working with the dog’s natural drive stimuli, one reduces it with ritual proceedings and often places an enormous value on peripheral matters. Dogs trained in this way visibly lack the intensity and passion to search and the drive needed to carry out a longer search.

Figure 2.1 The search and rescue dog, here a Malinois, must give its handler a clear and understandable signal that it has found a victim where the human odor concentration is highest.

 







Что делает отдел по эксплуатации и сопровождению ИС? Отвечает за сохранность данных (расписания копирования, копирование и пр.)...

Живите по правилу: МАЛО ЛИ ЧТО НА СВЕТЕ СУЩЕСТВУЕТ? Я неслучайно подчеркиваю, что место в голове ограничено, а информации вокруг много, и что ваше право...

Что способствует осуществлению желаний? Стопроцентная, непоколебимая уверенность в своем...

Конфликты в семейной жизни. Как это изменить? Редкий брак и взаимоотношения существуют без конфликтов и напряженности. Через это проходят все...





Не нашли то, что искали? Воспользуйтесь поиском гугл на сайте:


©2015- 2024 zdamsam.ru Размещенные материалы защищены законодательством РФ.